Diferencias en el canto de la Ratona Común (Troglodytes musculus) en ambientes con distintos niveles de influencia humana

Solange Mendes; Víctor J. Colino-Rabanal; Salvador J. Peris

doi:10.56178/eh.v26i2.680

Artículos Publicado 01 diciembre 2011 https://doi.org/10.56178/eh.v26i2.680

Diferencias en el canto de la Ratona Común (Troglodytes musculus) en ambientes con distintos niveles de influencia humana

ajuste vocal contaminación acústica hipótesis de adaptación acústica Troglodytes musculus

Solange Mendes Departamento de Biología Animal-Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca. Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, 37071 Salamanca, España

Víctor J. Colino-Rabanal Departamento de Biología Animal-Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca. Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, 37071 Salamanca, España

Salvador J. Peris Departamento de Biología Animal-Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca. Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, 37071 Salamanca, España

Resumen

Se ha demostrado que algunas especies de aves son capaces de modificar sus cantos para evitar ser enmascarados por el ruido de fondo, un hecho particular que se enmarca dentro de la hipótesis de adaptación acústica al ambiente circundante. En este estudio se realizó un análisis de los parámetros físicos y temporales del canto de la Ratona Común (Troglodytes musculus) en tres ambientes acústicos diferentes (áreas urbana, periurbana y rural) dentro de la zona metropolitana de Belém (Brasil). Para evaluar el impacto acústico sobre el canto de la especie no se consideró el espectro completo del ruido ambiental sino sólo aquel que se encuentra en el rango de vocalización de la especie, que es el que potencialmente puede interferir en el canto. Algunos de los parámetros del canto, como la concentración de energía en relación a las frecuencias o la duración de las notas, se correlacionaron con los niveles de ruido ambiental. Las discrepancias entre los resultados obtenidos a partir de los niveles de ruido y de la zonificación urbana pueden ser una consecuencia de diferencias en la vegetación o en las características propias del planeamiento urbanístico de la ciudad de Belém. Tales correlaciones pueden ser un indicio de la adaptación acústica pero también puede haber otros factores que las expliquen. Si estos cambios se explicaran por los niveles de ruido ambiental, se requeriría una investigación orientada a demostrar que tales cambios contribuyen a una mejora efectiva de la transmisión del canto.

PDF

Referencias

BAKER MC Y LOGUE DM (2007) A comparison of threenoise reduction procedures applied to bird vocalsignals. Journal of Field Ornithology 78:240–253
BEECHER MD (1982) Signature systems and kin re-cognition. Integrative and Comparative Biology 22:477–490
BEECHER MD (1988) Kin recognition in birds. Behav-iour Genetics 18:465–482
BEECHER MD (1989) Signalling systems for individualrecognition: an information theory approach. Ani-mal Behaviour 38:248–261
BIBBY CJ Y BURGESS ND (2000) Bird census techniques.Academic Press, Londres
BONIER F, MARTIN PR, SHELDON KS, JENSEN JP, FOLTZSL Y WINGFIELD JC (2007) Sex-specific consequencesof life in the city. Behavioral Ecology 18:121–129
BROWN TJ Y HANDFORD P (2000) Sound design forvocalizations: quality in the woods, consistency inthe fields. Condor 102:81–92
BRUMM H (2004) The impact of environmental noiseon song amplitude in a territorial bird. Journal ofAnimal Ecology 73:434–440
BRUMM H Y SLABBEKOORN H (2005) Acoustic comm-unication in noise. Advances in the Study of Behavior35:151–209
BRUMM H Y TODT D (2002) Noise-dependent songamplitude regulation in a territorial songbird. Ani-mal Behaviour 63:891–897
CAVALCANTE KV (2009) Avaliação acústica ambiental dehábitats de passeriformes expostos a ruídos antrópicosem Minas Gerais e São Paulo. Tesis de maestría, Uni-versidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte
CAVALCANTE KV, MENDES S, CORBO M Y SCHWABE WK(2008) Avaliação acústica ambiental de um hábitaturbano do pássaro Troglodytes aedon exposto aoruído de tráfego em Campinas. Pp. 1–7 en: Anais doXXII Encontro da Sociedade Brasileira de Acústica.Sociedade Brasileira de Acústica, Belo Horizonte
CYNX J, LEWIS R, TAVEL B Y TSE H (1998) Amplituderegulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbirdTaeniopygia guttata. Animal Behaviour 56:107–113
DOYLE RL, MCCOWAN B, HANSER SF, CHYBA C, BUCCIT Y BLUE JE (2008) Applicability of informationtheory to the quantification of responses to anthro-pogenic noise by Southeast Alaskan HumpbackWhales. Entropy 10:33–46
ENDLER JA (1993) The color of light in forests and itsimplications. Ecological Monographs 63:1–27
FASANELLA M Y FERNÁNDEZ GJ (2009) Alarm calls ofthe Southern House Wren Troglodytes musculus:variation with nesting stage and predator model.Journal of Ornithology 150:853–863
FERNÁNDEZ-JURICIC E, POSTON R, COLLIBUS K, MORGANT, BASTIAN B, MARTIN C, JONES K Y TREMINIO R (2005)Microhabitat selection and singing behavior pat-terns of male house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) inurban parks in a heavily urbanized landscape inthe western U.S. Urban Habitats 3:49–69
FOWLER J Y COHEN L (1999) Estadística básica enOrnitología. SEO-BirdLife, Madrid
FULLER RA, WARREN PH Y GASTON KJ (2007) Daytimenoise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins.Biological Letters 3:368–370
HABIB L, BAYNE EM Y BOUTIN S (2007) Chronic indus-trial noise affects pairing success and age structureof ovenbirds Seiurus aurocapilla. Journal of AppliedEcology 44:176–184
HUY CARDOSO GC (2009) Are bird species that vocal-ize at higher frequencies preadapted to inhabitnoisy urban areas? Behavioral Ecology 20:1268–1273
JOHNSON LS Y KERMOTT H (1991) The functions of songin male house wrens (Troglodytes aedon). Behaviour116:190–209
KROODSMA DE (1977) Correlates of song organizationamong North American wrens. American Naturalist111:995–1008
MCKINNEY ML (2006) Urbanization as a major causeof biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation27:247–260
MILLER EH (1982) Character and variance shift inacoustic signals of birds. Pp. 253–295 en: KROODSMADE Y MILLER EH (eds) Acoustic communication in birds.Academic Press, Nueva York
MORTON ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection onavian sounds. American Naturalist 109:17–34
MORTON ES, GISH SL YVA NDER VOORT M (1986) Onthe learning of degraded and undegraded songsin the Carolina wren. Animal Behaviour 34:815–820
NOTTEBOHM F (1985) Sound transmission, signal sali-ence, and song dialects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences8:112–113
OBERWEGER K Y GOLLER F (2001) The metabolic costof birdsong production. Journal of Experimental Biol-ogy 204:3379–3388
PARRIS KM Y SCHNEIDER A (2009) Impacts of trafficnoise and traffic volume on birds on roadside habi-tat. Ecology and Society 14:art29
RALPH JC, GEUPEL GR, PYLE P, MARTIN TE, DESANTEDF Y MILA B (1996) Manual de métodos de campo parael monitoreo de aves terrestres. USDA Forest ServiceGeneral Technical Report PSW-GTR-159, Albany
SHANNON CE Y WEAVER W (1949) The mathematicaltheory of communication. University of Illinois Press,Chicago
SILVA ML (2001) Estrutura e organização de sinaisde comunicação complexos: o caso do sabiá-laranjeira Turdus rufiventris (Aves PasseriformesTurdidae). Tesis doctoral, Universidad de San Pablo,San Pablo
SILVA ML, PIQUEIRA JC Y VIELLIARD JME (2000) UsingShannon entropy on measuring the individual vari-ability in the rufous-bellied thrush Turdus rufiventrisvocal communication. Journal of Theoretical Biology207:57–64
SLABBEKOORN H (2004) Singing in the wild: the ecol-ogy of birdsong. Pp. 178–205 en: MARLER P YSLABBEKOORN H (eds) Nature’s music: the science ofbirdsong. Elsevier, San Diego
SLABBEKOORN H YDEN BOER-VISSER A (2006) Citieschange the songs of birds. Current Biology 16:2326–2331
SLABBEKOORN H Y PEET M (2003) Birds sing at a higherpitch in urban noise. Nature 424:267
SLABBEKOORN H Y RIPMEESTER EAP (2008) Birdsongand anthropogenic noise: implications and applica-tions for conservation. Molecular Ecology 17:72–83
SLABBEKOORN H Y SMITH TB (2002) Bird song, ecology,and speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the RoyalSociety B 357:493–503
SPECHT R (1998) Avisoft-SASLab Pro. Sound analysis andsynthesis laboratory. Avisoft Bioacoustics, Berlín
STONE E (2000) Separating the noise from the noise: afinding in support of the “Niche Hypothesis” thatbirds are influenced by human-induced noise innatural habitats. Anthrozoos 13:225–231
THOMAS RJ (2002) The costs of singing in nightingales.Animal Behaviour 63:959–966
TUBARO PL (1990) Song descriptions of the housewren (Troglodytes aedon) in two populations of east-ern Argentina, and some indirect evidences of imi-tative vocal learning. Hornero 13:111–116
TUBARO PL (1991) Can Troglodytes aedon in Argentina“mimic” the song of Thryomanes bewickii? Condor93:443–445
TUBARO PL Y LIJTMAER DA (2006) Environmental cor-relates of song structure in forest grosbeaks andsaltators. Condor 108:120–129
WARD S, SPEAKMAN JR Y SLATER PJB (2003) The energycost of song in the canary Serinus canaria. AnimalBehaviour 66:893–902
WILEY RH (1994) Errors exaggeration and deceptionin animal communication. Pp. 157–189 en: REAL L(ed) Behavioral mechanisms in ecology. University ofChicago Press, Chicago
WOOD WE Y YEZERINAC SM (2006) Song sparrow(Melospiza melodia) song varies with urban noise. Auk123:650–659

Cómo citar

Solange Mendes, Víctor J. Colino-Rabanal, Salvador J. Peris (2011). Diferencias en el canto de la Ratona Común (Troglodytes musculus) en ambientes con distintos niveles de influencia humana. El Hornero, Vol. 26 Núm. 2 (2011), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.56178/eh.v26i2.680

Descargas

505Visualizaciones del resumen

1Formatos

Licencia: CC BY-NC 4.0

[1] BAKER MC Y LOGUE DM (2007) A comparison of threenoise reduction procedures applied to bird vocalsignals. Journal of Field Ornithology 78:240–253

[2] BEECHER MD (1982) Signature systems and kin re-cognition. Integrative and Comparative Biology 22:477–490

[3] BEECHER MD (1988) Kin recognition in birds. Behav-iour Genetics 18:465–482

[4] BEECHER MD (1989) Signalling systems for individualrecognition: an information theory approach. Ani-mal Behaviour 38:248–261

[5] BIBBY CJ Y BURGESS ND (2000) Bird census techniques.Academic Press, Londres

[6] BONIER F, MARTIN PR, SHELDON KS, JENSEN JP, FOLTZSL Y WINGFIELD JC (2007) Sex-specific consequencesof life in the city. Behavioral Ecology 18:121–129

[7] BROWN TJ Y HANDFORD P (2000) Sound design forvocalizations: quality in the woods, consistency inthe fields. Condor 102:81–92

[8] BRUMM H (2004) The impact of environmental noiseon song amplitude in a territorial bird. Journal ofAnimal Ecology 73:434–440

[9] BRUMM H Y SLABBEKOORN H (2005) Acoustic comm-unication in noise. Advances in the Study of Behavior35:151–209

[10] BRUMM H Y TODT D (2002) Noise-dependent songamplitude regulation in a territorial songbird. Ani-mal Behaviour 63:891–897

[11] CAVALCANTE KV (2009) Avaliação acústica ambiental dehábitats de passeriformes expostos a ruídos antrópicosem Minas Gerais e São Paulo. Tesis de maestría, Uni-versidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte

[12] CAVALCANTE KV, MENDES S, CORBO M Y SCHWABE WK(2008) Avaliação acústica ambiental de um hábitaturbano do pássaro Troglodytes aedon exposto aoruído de tráfego em Campinas. Pp. 1–7 en: Anais doXXII Encontro da Sociedade Brasileira de Acústica.Sociedade Brasileira de Acústica, Belo Horizonte

[13] CYNX J, LEWIS R, TAVEL B Y TSE H (1998) Amplituderegulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbirdTaeniopygia guttata. Animal Behaviour 56:107–113

[14] DOYLE RL, MCCOWAN B, HANSER SF, CHYBA C, BUCCIT Y BLUE JE (2008) Applicability of informationtheory to the quantification of responses to anthro-pogenic noise by Southeast Alaskan HumpbackWhales. Entropy 10:33–46

[15] ENDLER JA (1993) The color of light in forests and itsimplications. Ecological Monographs 63:1–27

[16] FASANELLA M Y FERNÁNDEZ GJ (2009) Alarm calls ofthe Southern House Wren Troglodytes musculus:variation with nesting stage and predator model.Journal of Ornithology 150:853–863

[17] FERNÁNDEZ-JURICIC E, POSTON R, COLLIBUS K, MORGANT, BASTIAN B, MARTIN C, JONES K Y TREMINIO R (2005)Microhabitat selection and singing behavior pat-terns of male house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) inurban parks in a heavily urbanized landscape inthe western U.S. Urban Habitats 3:49–69

[18] FOWLER J Y COHEN L (1999) Estadística básica enOrnitología. SEO-BirdLife, Madrid

[19] FULLER RA, WARREN PH Y GASTON KJ (2007) Daytimenoise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins.Biological Letters 3:368–370

[20] HABIB L, BAYNE EM Y BOUTIN S (2007) Chronic indus-trial noise affects pairing success and age structureof ovenbirds Seiurus aurocapilla. Journal of AppliedEcology 44:176–184

[21] HUY CARDOSO GC (2009) Are bird species that vocal-ize at higher frequencies preadapted to inhabitnoisy urban areas? Behavioral Ecology 20:1268–1273

[22] JOHNSON LS Y KERMOTT H (1991) The functions of songin male house wrens (Troglodytes aedon). Behaviour116:190–209

[23] KROODSMA DE (1977) Correlates of song organizationamong North American wrens. American Naturalist111:995–1008

[24] MCKINNEY ML (2006) Urbanization as a major causeof biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation27:247–260

[25] MILLER EH (1982) Character and variance shift inacoustic signals of birds. Pp. 253–295 en: KROODSMADE Y MILLER EH (eds) Acoustic communication in birds.Academic Press, Nueva York

[26] MORTON ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection onavian sounds. American Naturalist 109:17–34

[27] MORTON ES, GISH SL YVA NDER VOORT M (1986) Onthe learning of degraded and undegraded songsin the Carolina wren. Animal Behaviour 34:815–820

[28] NOTTEBOHM F (1985) Sound transmission, signal sali-ence, and song dialects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences8:112–113

[29] OBERWEGER K Y GOLLER F (2001) The metabolic costof birdsong production. Journal of Experimental Biol-ogy 204:3379–3388

[30] PARRIS KM Y SCHNEIDER A (2009) Impacts of trafficnoise and traffic volume on birds on roadside habi-tat. Ecology and Society 14:art29

[31] RALPH JC, GEUPEL GR, PYLE P, MARTIN TE, DESANTEDF Y MILA B (1996) Manual de métodos de campo parael monitoreo de aves terrestres. USDA Forest ServiceGeneral Technical Report PSW-GTR-159, Albany

[32] SHANNON CE Y WEAVER W (1949) The mathematicaltheory of communication. University of Illinois Press,Chicago

[33] SILVA ML (2001) Estrutura e organização de sinaisde comunicação complexos: o caso do sabiá-laranjeira Turdus rufiventris (Aves PasseriformesTurdidae). Tesis doctoral, Universidad de San Pablo,San Pablo

[34] SILVA ML, PIQUEIRA JC Y VIELLIARD JME (2000) UsingShannon entropy on measuring the individual vari-ability in the rufous-bellied thrush Turdus rufiventrisvocal communication. Journal of Theoretical Biology207:57–64

[35] SLABBEKOORN H (2004) Singing in the wild: the ecol-ogy of birdsong. Pp. 178–205 en: MARLER P YSLABBEKOORN H (eds) Nature’s music: the science ofbirdsong. Elsevier, San Diego

[36] SLABBEKOORN H YDEN BOER-VISSER A (2006) Citieschange the songs of birds. Current Biology 16:2326–2331

[37] SLABBEKOORN H Y PEET M (2003) Birds sing at a higherpitch in urban noise. Nature 424:267

[38] SLABBEKOORN H Y RIPMEESTER EAP (2008) Birdsongand anthropogenic noise: implications and applica-tions for conservation. Molecular Ecology 17:72–83

[39] SLABBEKOORN H Y SMITH TB (2002) Bird song, ecology,and speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the RoyalSociety B 357:493–503

[40] SPECHT R (1998) Avisoft-SASLab Pro. Sound analysis andsynthesis laboratory. Avisoft Bioacoustics, Berlín

[41] STONE E (2000) Separating the noise from the noise: afinding in support of the “Niche Hypothesis” thatbirds are influenced by human-induced noise innatural habitats. Anthrozoos 13:225–231

[42] THOMAS RJ (2002) The costs of singing in nightingales.Animal Behaviour 63:959–966

[43] TUBARO PL (1990) Song descriptions of the housewren (Troglodytes aedon) in two populations of east-ern Argentina, and some indirect evidences of imi-tative vocal learning. Hornero 13:111–116

[44] TUBARO PL (1991) Can Troglodytes aedon in Argentina“mimic” the song of Thryomanes bewickii? Condor93:443–445

[45] TUBARO PL Y LIJTMAER DA (2006) Environmental cor-relates of song structure in forest grosbeaks andsaltators. Condor 108:120–129

[46] WARD S, SPEAKMAN JR Y SLATER PJB (2003) The energycost of song in the canary Serinus canaria. AnimalBehaviour 66:893–902

[47] WILEY RH (1994) Errors exaggeration and deceptionin animal communication. Pp. 157–189 en: REAL L(ed) Behavioral mechanisms in ecology. University ofChicago Press, Chicago

[48] WOOD WE Y YEZERINAC SM (2006) Song sparrow(Melospiza melodia) song varies with urban noise. Auk123:650–659