La conservación de las aves en la era de la genómica
Tapa del número actual
PDF

Palabras clave

conservación
genética de la conservación
genómica
secuenciación de próxima generación

Cómo citar

Mahler, Bettina. 2018. “La conservación De Las Aves En La Era De La genómica”. El Hornero 33 (2): 85-96. https://doi.org/10.56178/eh.v33i2.478.

Resumen

Las técnicas de secuenciación masiva o secuenciación de próxima generación han cambiado la forma de obtener datos genéticos para los estudios de conservación en aves, pasando del análisis de unos pocos loci ubicados en una pequeña porción del genoma a la obtención de información de cientos a miles de loci ubicados a lo largo de todo el genoma. Un mayor número de marcadores brinda más información para estudios filogenéticos, de introgresión y de estructuración poblacional, y permite una mejor estimación de los parámetros demográficos. Índices como la heterocigosis, el parentesco, la paternidad y la endogamia pueden ser estimados con mayor precisión. Además, uno de los mayores aportes de los estudios genómicos es la identificación de variación tanto adaptativa como neutra. En este trabajo se explica brevemente la base metodológica de la secuenciación masiva y se muestran ejemplos de la utilización de datos genómicos en estudios de conservación en aves.

PDF

Referencias

ALLENDORF FW (2017) Genetics and the conservationof natural populations: allozymes to genomes.Molecular Ecology 26:420–430

ANDERSEN MJ, MANTHEY JD, NAIKATINI A Y MOYLE RG(2017) Conservation genomics of the silktail (Aves:Lamprolia victoriae) suggests the need for increasedprotection of native forest on the Natewa Penin-sula, Fiji. Conservation Genetics 18:1277–1285

ANDREW SC, TAYLOR MP, LUNDREGAN S, LIEN S, JENSENH Y GRIFFITH SC (en prensa) Signs of adaptation totrace metal contamination in a common urban bird.Science of the Total Environment

AVISE JC (2010) Perspective: conservation genetics entersthe genomics era. Conservation Genetics 11:665–669

BAIRD NA, ETTER PD, ATWOOD TS, CURREY MC, SHIVERAL, LEWIS ZA, SELKER EU, CRESKO WA Y JOHNSONEA (2008) Rapid SNP discovery and genetic map-ping using sequenced RAD markers. PloS One3:e3376

BALL AD, STAPLEY J, DAWSON DA, BIRKHEAD TR, BURKET Y SLATE J (2010) A comparison of SNPs andmicrosatellites as linkage mapping markers: lessonsfrom the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). BMCGenomics 11:art218

BATTEY CJ, LINCK EB, EPPERLY KL, FRENCH C, SLAGERDL, SYKES PW Y KLICKA J (2017) A migratory dividein the Painted Bunting (Passerina ciris). AmericanNaturalist 191:259–268

BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2018) Species factsheet:Gubernatrix cristata. BirdLife International, Cam-bridge (URL: http://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/yellow-cardinal-gubernatrix-cristata)

BOUZAT JL (2010) Conservation genetics of popula-tion bottlenecks: the role of chance, selection andhistory. Conservation Genetics 11:463–478

BULGARELLA M, KOPUCHIAN C, DI GIACOMO AS, MATUSR, BLANK O, WILSON RE Y MCCRACKEN KG (2014)Molecular phylogeny of the South Americansheldgeese with implications for conservation ofFalkland Islands (Malvinas) and continentalpopulations of the Ruddy-headed Goose Chloephagarubidiceps and Upland Goose C. picta. Bird Conser-vation International 24:59–71

CAMPAGNA L, GRONAU I, SILVEIRA LF, SIEPEL A Y LOVETTEIJ (2015) Distinguishing noise from signal in pat-terns of genomic divergence in a highly polymor-phic avian radiation. Molecular Ecology 24:4238–4251

CAMPAGNA L, REPENNING M, SILVEIRA LF, SUERTEGARAYFONTANA C, TUBARO PL & LOVETTE IJ (2017) Repeateddivergent selection on pigmentation genes in arapid finch radiation. Science Advances 3:art1602404

CHARLESWORTH B (2001) The effect of life-history andmode of inheritance on neutral genetic variability.Genetical Research 77:153–166

DAVEY JW, HOHENLOHE PA, ETTER PD, BOONE JQ,CATCHEN JM Y BLAXTER ML (2011) Genome-widegenetic marker discovery and genotyping usingnext-generation sequencing. Nature Reviews Genetics12:499–510

DESAIX MG, BULLUCK LP, ECKERT AJ, VIVERETTE CB,BOVES TJ, REESE JA, TONRA CM Y DYER RJ (en prensa)Population assignment reveals low migratory connecti-vity in a weakly structured songbird. Molecular Ecology

DOMÍNGUEZ M, PIZZARELLO G, ATENCIO M, SCARDA-MAGLIA R Y MAHLER B (en prensa) Genetic assign-ment and monitoring of yellow cardinals. Journal ofWildlife Management

DOYLE JM, BELL DA, BLOOM PH, EMMONS G, FESNOCKA, KATZNER TE, LAPRÉ L, LEONARD K, SANMIGUEL P,WESTERMAN R Y DEWOODY JA (2018) New insights intothe phylogenetics and population structure of theprairie falcon (Falco mexicanus). BMC Genomics 19:art233

ELGVIN TO, TRIER CN, TØRRESEN OK, HAGEN IJ, LIENS, NEDERBRAGT AJ, RAVINET M, JENSEN H Y SÆTRE GP(2017) The genomic mosaicism of hybrid speciation.Science Advances 3:art1602996

ELLEGREN H (2010) Evolutionary stasis: the stablechromosomes of birds. Trends in Ecology and Evolu-tion 25:283–291

ELLEGREN H (2013) The evolutionary genomics ofbirds. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Sys-tematics 44:239–259

ELLEGREN H (2014) Genome sequencing and popula-tion genomics in non-model organisms. Trends inEcology and Evolution 29:51–63

ELSHIRE RJ, GLAUBITZ JC, SUN Q, POLAND JA, KAWA-MOTO K, BUCKLER ES Y MITCHELL SE (2011) A robust,simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approachfor high diversity species. PLoS One 6:e19379

EÖRY L, GILBERT MT, LI C, LI B, ARCHIBALD A, AKENBL, ZHANG G, JARVIS E, FLICEK P Y BURT DW (2015)Avianbase: a community resource for bird geno-mics. Genome Biology 16:art21

FEDER JL, EGAN SP Y NOSIL P (2012) The genomics ofspeciation-with-gene-flow. Trends in Genetics28:342–350

FERNANDES G Y CAPARROZ R (2013) DNA sequenceanalysis to guide the release of blue and yellowmacaws (Ara ararauna, Psittaciformes, Aves) fromthe illegal trade back to the wild. Molecular BiologyReports 40:2757–2762

FRANKEL OH (1974) Genetic conservation: our evo-lutionary responsibility. Genetics 78:53–65

FRANKHAM R (1995) Conservation genetics. AnnualReview of Genetics 29:305–327

FRANKHAM R (2005) Stress and adaptation in conser-vation genetics. Journal of Evolutionary Biology18:750–755

FRANKHAM R (2010) Challenges and opportunities ofgenetic approaches to biological conservation. Bio-logical Conservation 143:1919–1927

FRANKHAM R, BALLOU JD, ELDRIDGE MDB, LACY RC,RALLS K, DUDASH MR Y FENSTER CB (2011) Predict-ing the probability of outbreeding depression. Con-servation Biology 25:465–475

FRASER DJ Y BERNATCHEZ L (2001) Adaptive evolution-ary conservation: towards a unified concept fordefining conservation units. Molecular Ecology10:2741–2752

FUENTES-PARDO AP Y RUZZANTE DE (2017) Whole-genome sequencing approaches for conservationbiology: advantages, limitations and practical rec-ommendations. Molecular Ecology 26:5369–5406

FUNK WC, MCKAY JK, HOHENLOHE PA Y ALLENDORFFW (2012) Harnessing genomics for delineatingconservation units. Trends in Ecology and Evolution27:489–496

GALLA SJ, FORSDICK NJ, BROWN L, HOEPPNER MP, KNAPPM, MALONEY RF, MORAGA R, SANTURE AW Y STEEVESTE (en prensa) Reference genomes from distantlyrelated species can be used for discovery of singlenucleotide polymorphisms to inform conservationmanagement. Genes

GILLIGAN DM, BRISCOE DA Y FRANKHAM R (2005) Com-parative losses of quantitative and molecular geneticvariation in finite populations of Drosophilamelanogaster. Genetical Research 85:47–55

GOMULKIEWICZ R Y HOLT RD (2006) When does evo-lution by natural selection prevent extinction? Evo-lution 49:201–207

GOODWIN S, MCPHERSON JD Y MCCOMBIE WR (2016)Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequen-cing technologies. Nature Reviews Genetics 17:333–351

GREGORY TR (2005) Synergy between sequence andsize in large-scale genomics. Nature Reviews Genet-ics 6:699–708

GROHME MA, FRIAS SOLER R, WINK M Y FROHME M(2013) Microsatellite marker discovery using singlemolecule real-time circular consensus sequencingon the Pacific Biosciences RS. BioTechniques55:253–256

HARTMANN SA, SCHAEFER HM Y SEGELBACHER G (2014)Development of 12 microsatellite loci for the endan-gered Pale-headed Brushfinch (Atlapetes pallidiceps)and their cross-amplification in two co-occurringbrushfinches. Journal of Ornithology 155:835–839

HARVEY MG, SMITH BT, GLENN TC, FAIRCLOTH BC YBRUMFIELD RT (2016) Sequence capture versusrestriction site associated DNA sequencing for shal-low systematics. Systematic Biology 65:910–924

HEDRICK PW (2001) Conservation genetics: where arewe now? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:629–636HOBAN S, KELLEY JL, LOTTERHOS KE, ANTOLIN MF,BRADBURD G, LOWRY DB, POSS ML, REED LK, STORFERA Y WHITLOCK MC (2016) Finding the genomic basisof local adaptation: pitfalls, practical solutions andfuture directions. American Naturalist 188:379–397

IUCN (2018) The IUCN Red List of threatened species.IUCN, Gland (URL: http://www.iucnredlist.org/)

IUCN SPECIES SURVIVAL COMMISSION (2013) Guidelinesfor reintroductions and other conservation translocations.Version 1.0. IUCN, Gland

KAISER SA, TAYLOR SA, CHEN N, SILLETT TS, BONDRAER Y WEBSTER MS (2017) A comparative assessmentof SNP and microsatellite markers for assigningparentage in a socially monogamous bird. Molecu-lar Ecology Resources 17:183–193

KAWECKI TJ Y EBERT D (2004) Conceptual issues in localadaptation. Ecology Letters 7:1225–1241

KIIALAINEN A, KARLBERG O, AHLFORD A, SIGURDSSON S,LINDBLAD-TOH K Y SYVÄNEN AC (2011) Performanceof microarray and liquid based capture methods fortarget enrichment for massively parallel sequencingand SNP discovery. PLoS One 6:e16486

KLICKA LB, KUS BE, TITLE PO Y BURNS KJ (2016) Con-servation genomics reveals multiple evolutionaryunits within Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii). ConservationGenetics 17:455–471

KOHN MH, MURPHY WJ, OSTRANDER EA Y WAYNE RK(2006) Genomics and conservation genetics. Trendsin Ecology and Evolution 21:629–637

KOPUCHIAN C, CAMPAGNA L, DI GIACOMO AS, WILSONRE, BULGARELLA M, PETRACCI P, MAZAR BARNETT J,MATUS R, BLANK O Y MCCRACKEN KG (2016) Demo-graphic history inferred from genome-wide datareveals two lineages of sheldgeese endemic to a gla-cial refugium in the southern Atlantic. Journal of Bio-geography 43:1979–1989

LABUSCHAGNE C, NUPEN L, KOTZÉ A, GROBLER PJ YDALTON DL (2015) Assessment of microsatellite andSNP markers for parentage assignment in ex situAfrican Penguin (Spheniscus demersus) populations.Ecology and Evolution 5:4389–4399

LACY RC (1994) Managing genetic diversity in cap-tive populations of animals. Pp. 63–89 en: BOWLESML Y WHELAN CJ (eds) Restoration and recovery ofendangered plants and animals. Cambridge Univer-sity Press, Cambridge

LACY RC (2013) Achieving true sustainability of zoopopulations. Zoo Biology 32:19–26

LANGIN KM, ALDRIDGE CL, FIKE JA, CORNMAN RS,MARTIN K, WANN GT, SEGLUND AE, SCHROEDER MA,BRAUN CE, BENSON DP, FEDY BC, YOUNG JR,WILSON S, WOLFE DH Y OYLER-MCCANCE SJ (2018)Characterizing range-wide divergence in analpine-endemic bird: a comparison of genetic andgenomic approaches. Conservation Genetics19:1471–1485

LEE L, TIRRELL N, BURRELL C, CHAMBERS S, VOGEL S YDOMYAN ET (2018) Genetic tests reveal extra-pairpaternity among Gentoo penguins (Pyogoscelispapua ellsworthii) at Loveland Living PlanetAquarium: implications for ex situ colony manage-ment. Zoo Biology 37:236–244

MACE GM (2004) The role of taxonomy in species con-servation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Soci-ety of London B 359:711–719

MARRA PP, COHEN EB, LOSS SR, RUTTER JE Y TONRACM (2015) A call for full annual cycle research inanimal ecology. Biology Letters 11:art20150552

MARTIN-WINTLE MS, WINTLE NJP, DÍEZ-LEÓN M,SWAISGOOD RR Y ASA CS (en prensa) Improving thesustainability of ex situ populations with matechoice. Zoo Biology

MCMAHON BJ, TEELING EC Y HÖGLUND J (2014) Howand why should we implement genomics into con-servation? Evolutionary Applications 7:999–1007MEIRMANS PG (2015) Seven common mistakes inpopulation genetics and how to avoid them.Molecular Ecology 24:3223–3231

NARUM SR, BUERKLE CA, DAVEY JW, MILLER MR YHOHENLOHE PA (2013) Genotyping-by-sequencingin ecological and conservation genomics. MolecularEcology 22:2841–2847

NG EYX, GARG KM, LOW GW, CHATTOPADHYAY B, OHRRY, LEE JGH Y RHEINDT FE (2017) Conservationgenomics identifies impact of trade in a threatenedsongbird. Biological Conservation 214:101–108

NOOR MAF Y BENNETT SM (2009) Islands of speciationor mirages in the desert: examining the role ofrestricted recombination in maintaining species.Heredity 103:439–444

OUBORG NJ, PERTOLDI C, LOESCHCKE V, BIJLSMA RK YHEDRICK PW (2010) Conservation genetics in tran-sition to conservation genomics. Trends in Genetics26:177–187

OYLER-MCCANCE SJ, OH KP, LANGIN KM Y ALDRIDGECL (2016) A field ornithologist’s guide to genomics:practical considerations for ecology and conserva-tion. Auk 133:626–64

8OZSOLAK F Y MILOS PM (2011) RNA sequencing:advances, challenges and opportunities. NatureReviews Genetics 12:87–98

PARIS JR, STEVENS JR Y CATCHEN JM (2017) Lost inparameter space: a road map for STACKS. Methodsin Ecology and Evolution 8:1360–1373

PERTOLDI C, BIJLSMA R Y LOESCHCKE V (2007) Conser-vation genetics in a globally changing environment:present problems, paradoxes and future challenges.Biodiversity and Conservation 16:4147–4163

PETERS JL, LAVRETSKY P, DACOSTA JM, BIELEFELD RR,FEDDERSEN JC Y SORENSON MD (2016) Populationgenomic data delineate conservation units in mot-tled ducks (Anas fulvigula). Biological Conservation203:272–281

PETERSON BK, WEBER JN, KAY EH, FISHER HS YHOEKSTRA HE (2012) Double digest RADseq: aninexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery andgenotyping in model and non-model species. PLoSOne 7:e37135

POELSTRA JW, VIJAY N, BOSSU CM, LANTZ H, RYLL B,MULLER I, BAGLIONE V, UNNEBERG P, WIKELSKI M,GRABHERR MG, UNNEBERG P & WOLF JBW (2014) Thegenomic landscape underlying phenotypic integ-rity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science344:1410–1414

PRATT D Y MITTERMEIER JC (2016) Notes on the natu-ral history, taxonomy and conservation of theendemic avifauna of the Samoan Archipelago.Wilson Journal of Ornithology 128:217–241

PRIMMER CR, PAINTER JN, KOSKINEN MT, PALO JU YMERILÄ J (2005) Factors affecting avian cross-speciesmicrosatellite amplification. Journal of Avian Biology36:348–360

RUEGG KC, ANDERSON EC, PAXTON KL, APKENAS V, LAOS, SIEGEL RB, DESANTE DF, MOORE F Y SMITH TB (2014)Mapping migration in a songbird using high-resolution genetic markers. Molecular Ecology23:5726–5739

RUEGG KC, BAY RA, ANDERSON EC, SARACCO JF,HARRIGAN RJ, WHITFIELD M, PAXTON EH Y SMITH TB(2018) Ecological genomics predicts climate vulner-ability in an endangered southwestern songbird.Ecology Letters 21:1085–1096

RUNGE CA, MARTIN TG, POSSINGHAM HP, WILLIS SG YFULLER RA (2014) Conserving mobile species. Fron-tiers in Ecology and the Environment 12:395–402

SANGER F, NICKLEN S Y COULSON AR (1977) DNAsequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Pro-ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences74:5463–5467

SAVOLAINEN O, LASCOUX M Y MERILÄ J (2013) Ecologi-cal genomics of local adaptation. Nature ReviewsGenetics 14:807–820

SHAFER ABA, WOLF JBW, ALVES PC, BERGSTRÖM L,BRUFORD MW, BRÄNNSTRÖM I, COLLING G, DALÉN L,DE MEESTER L, EKBLOM R, FAWCETT KD, FIOR S,HAJIBABAEI M, HILL JA, HOEZEL AR, HÖGLUND J,JENSEN EL, KRAUSE J, KRISTENSEN TN, KRÜTZEN M,MCKAY JK, NORMAN AJ, OGDEN R, ÖSTERLING EM,OUBORG NJ, PICCOLO J, POPOVIC D, PRIMMER CR,REED FA, ROUMET M, SALMONA J, SCHENEKAR T,SCHWARTZ MK, SEGELBACHER G, SENN H, THAULOW J,VALTONEN M, VEALE A, VERGEER P, VIJAY N, VILÀ C,WEISSENSTEINER M, WENNERSTRÖM L, WHEAT CW YZIELINSKI P (2015) Genomics and the challengingtranslation into conservation practice. Trends in Ecol-ogy and Evolution 30:78–87

STAPLEY J, REGER J, FEULNER PGD, SMADJA C, GALINDOJ, EKBLOM R, BENNISON C, BALL AD, BECKERMAN APY SLATE J (2010) Adaptation genomics: the next gen-eration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25:705–712

VA N STRAALEN NM Y ROELOFS D (2006) An introduction toecological genomics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

TEER JK, BONNYCASTLE LL, CHINES PS, HANSEN NF,AOYAMA N, SWIFT AJ, ABAAN HO, ALBERT TJ, MARGU-LIES EH, GREEN ED, COLLINS FS, MULLIKIN JC YBIESECKER LG (2010) Systematic comparison of threegenomic enrichment methods for massively paral-lel DNA sequencing. Genome Research 20:1420–1431

THRASHER DJ, BUTCHER BG, CAMPAGNA L, WEBSTER MSY LOVETTE IJ (2018) Double-digest RAD sequencingoutperforms microsatellite loci at assigning pater-nity and estimating relatedness: a proof of conceptin a highly promiscuous bird. Molecular EcologyResources 18:953–965

TOEWS DPL, CAMPAGNA L, TAYLOR SA, BALAKRISHNANCN, BALDASSARRE DT, DEANE-COE PE, HARVEY MG,HOOPER DM, IRWIN DE, JUDY CD, MASON NA,MCCORMACK JE, MCCRACKEN KG, OLIVEROS CH,SAFRAN RJ, SCORDATO ESC, STRYJEWSKI KF, TIGANO A,UY JAK Y WINGER BM (2015) Genomic approachesto understanding population divergence andspeciation in birds. Auk 133:13–30

WEINMAN LR, SOLOMON JW Y RUBENSTEIN DR (2015)A comparison of single nucleotide polymorphismand microsatellite markers for analysis of parent-age and kinship in a cooperatively breeding bird.Molecular Ecology Resources 15:502–511

WU CI (2001) The genic view of the process ofspeciation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology14:851–865

ZHANG G, LI B, LI C, GILBERT MTP, JARVIS ED Y WANG J(2014a) Comparative genomic data of the AvianPhylogenomics Project. GigaScience 3:art26

ZHANG G, LI C, LI Q, LI B, LARKIN DM, LEE C, STORZJF, ANTUNES A, GREENWOLD MJ, MEREDITH RW, ÖDEENA, CUI J, ZHOU Q, XU L, PAN H, WANG Z, JIN L, ZHANGP, HU H, YANG W, HU J, XIAO J, YANG Z, LIU Y, XIE Q,YU H, LIAN J, WEN P, ZHANG F, LI H, ZENG Y, XIONGZ, LIU S, ZHOU L, HUANG Z, AN N, WANG J, ZHENGQ, XIONG Y, WANG G, WANG B, WANG J, FAN Y, DAFONSECA RR, ALFARO-NÚÑEZ A, SCHUBERT M,ORLANDO L, MOURIER T, HOWARD JT, GANAPATHY G,PFENNING A, WHITNEY O, RIVAS MV, HARA E, SMITH J,FARRÉ M, NARAYAN J, SLAVOV G, ROMANOV MN,BORGES R, MACHADO JP, KHAN I, SPRINGER MS, GATESYJ, HOFFMANN FG, OPAZO JC, HÅSTAD O, SAWYER RH,KIM H, KIM KW, KIM HJ, CHO S, LI N, HUANG Y,BRUFORD MW, ZHAN X, DIXON A, BERTELSEN MF,DERRYBERRY E, WARREN W, WILSON RK, LI S, RAYDA, GREEN RE, O’BRIEN SJ, GRIFFIN D, JOHNSONWE, HAUSSLER D, RYDER OA, WILLERSLEV E, GRAVESGR, ALSTRÖM P, FJELDSÅ J, MINDELL DP, EDWARDSSV, BRAUN EL, RAHBEK C, BURT DW, HOUDE P,ZHANG Y, YANG H, WANG J, AVIAN GENOME CON-SORTIUM, JARVIS ED, GILBERT MTP Y WANG J (2014b)Comparative genomics reveals insights into aviangenome evolution and adaptation. Science346:1311–1320

ZINK RM (2004) The role of subspecies in obscuringavian biological diversity and misleading conser-vation policy. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Bio-logical Sciences 271:561–564

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas aún no están disponibles.