Keywords
foraging trips
parental body size
reproductive success
sex
Spheniscus magellanicus
Abstract
The aim of this work was to study foraging trip duration and body size of male and female Magellanic Penguins during the breeding season and to determine the association of these parameters with both reproductive success and clutch quality in a colony located in the Beagle Channel, Tierra del Fuego. Trip duration differed significantly between sexes and between breeding stages. Females performed longer trips than males during incubation. We suggest that this could be due to differences in body reserves and foraging capabilities related with their body condition. In both sexes, foraging trips during incubation were longer than in the other stages, while the shortest trips were observed during early chick rearing. Trips were shorter when chicks were smaller and required greater parental care. A high value of reproductive success (1.51 chicks per nest) was recorded in comparison to that observed in colonies from the Malvinas Islands and Punta Tombo. These results could be related to differences in food availability in nearby waters. Body size of parents was not associated with reproductive success. Notwithstanding, larger females produced larger chicks at early moult and clutches of higher quality. The correlation between female body size and chick size at early moult suggests an important contribution of females on chick’s development.
References
AINLEY DG, RIBIC CA, BALLARD G, HEATH S, GAFFNEY I,KARL BJ, BARTON KJ, WILSON PR Y WEBB S (2004)Geographic structure of Adelie penguin populations:overlap in colony-specific foraging areas. EcologicalMonographs 74:159–178
AMUNDSEN T Y STOCKLAND JN (1990) Egg size andparental quality influence nestling growth in theShag. Auk 107:410–413
ASHMOLE NP (1971) Sea bird ecology and the marineenvironment. Pp. 223–286 en: FARNER DS, KING JRY PARKES KC (eds) Avian biology. Volume 1. AcademicPress, Nueva York
BARBRAUD C, WEIMERSKIRCH H, ROBERTSON GG YJOUVENTIN P (1999) Size-related life history traits:insights from a study of snow petrels (Pagodromanivea). Journal of Animal Ecology 68:1179–1192
BOERSMA PD (2008) Penguins as marine sentinels.BioScience 58:597–607
BOERSMA PD Y REBSTOCK GA (2009) Foraging distanceaffects reproductive success in Magellanic penguins.Marine Ecology Progress Series 375:263–275
BOERSMA PD, REBSTOCK GA, FRERE E Y MOORE SE(2009) Following the fish: penguins and productiv-ity in the South Atlantic. Ecological Monographs79:59–76
BOERSMA PD, REBSTOCK GA, STOKES LD Y MAJLUF P(2007) Oceans apart: conservation models for twotemperate penguin species shaped by the marineenvironment. Marine Ecology Progress Series335:217–225
BOERSMA PD, STOKES DL Y YORIO PM (1990) Repro-ductive variability and historical change ofMagellanic Penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) atPunta Tombo, Argentina. Pp. 15–43 en: DAVIS LS YDARBY JT (eds) Penguin biology. Academic Press, SanDiego
CALDER WA (1996) Size, function and life history. DoverPublications, Nueva York
CATRY P, PHILLIPS R Y CROXALL JP (2005) Sexual segre-gation in birds: patterns, processes and implicationsfor conservation. Pp. 351–378 en: RUCKSTUHL KE YNEUHAUS P (eds) Sexual segregation in vertebrates: ecol-ogy of the two sexes. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge
CHAPPELL MA, JANES DN, SHOEMAKER VH, BUCHER TLY MALONEY SK (1993) Reproductive effort in Adéliepenguins. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology33:173–182
CLARKE J, MANLY B, KERRY K, GARDEN H, FRANCHI E,CORSOLINI S Y FOCARDI S (1998) Sex differences inAdélie penguin foraging strategies. Polar Biology20:248–258CLUTTON-BROCK TH (1991) The evolution of parental care.Princeton University Press, Princeton
CROXALL JP, TRATHAN PN Y MURPHY EJ (2002) Environ-mental change and Antarctic seabird populations.Science 297:1509–1514
CULIK BM Y LUNA-JORQUERA G (1997) Satellite track-ing of Humboldt penguins (Spheniscus humboldti)in northern Chile. Marine Biology 128:547–556
CULIK B, WOAKES AJ, ADELUNG D, WILSON RP, CORIANR Y SPAIRANI HJ (1990) Energy requirements ofAdelie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae) chicks. Journal ofComparative Physiology B. Biochemical, Systems, andEnvironmental Physiology 160:61–70
DEAGLE BE, GALES NJ Y HINDELL MA (2008) Variabil-ity in foraging behaviour of chick-rearing macaronipenguins Eudyptes chrysolophus and its relation todiet. Marine Ecology Progress Series 359:295–309
FORERO MG, HOBSON KA, BORTOLOTTI GR, DONÁZARJA, BERTELLOTTI M Y BLANCO G (2002) Food resourceutilization by the Magellanic penguin evaluatedthrough stable-isotope analysis: segregation by sexand age and influence on offspring quality. MarineEcology Progress Series 234:289–299
FOWLER GS, WINGFIELD JC, BOERSMA PD Y SOSA RA(1994) Reproductive endocrinology and weightchange in relation to reproductive success in theMagellanic Penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus).General and Comparative Endocrinology 94:305-315
FRERE E, GANDINI P Y LICHTSCHEIN V (1996) Variaciónlatitudinal en la dieta del Pingüino de Magallanes(Spheniscus magellanicus) en la costa patagónica,Argentina. Ornitología Neotropical 7:35–41
GANDINI P, FRERE E Y BOERSMA PD (1996) Status andconservation of Magellanic Penguins (Spheniscusmagellanicus) in Patagonia, Argentina. Bird Conser-vation International 6:307–316
GANDINI PA, FRERE E Y HOLIK TM (1992) Implicacionesde las diferencias en el tamaño corporal entre colo-nias para el uso de medidas morfométricas comométodo de sexado en Spheniscus magellanicus.Hornero 13:211–213
GONZÁLEZ-SOLÍS J, CROXALL JP Y WOOD AG (2000)Sexual dimorphism and sexual segregation in for-aging strategies of northern giant petrels, Macro-nectes halli, during incubation. Oikos 90:390–398
HOBSON KA (1993) Trophic relationships among highArctic seabirds: insights from tissue-dependentstable-isotope models. Marine Ecology Progress Series95:7–18
HOOD LC, BOERSMA PD Y WINGFIELD JC (1998) Theadrenocortical response to stress in incubatingMagellanic penguins Spheniscus magellanicus. Auk115:76–84
KATO A, NISHIUMI I Y NAITO Y (1996) Sexual differ-ences in the diet of king cormorants at MacquarieIsland. Polar Biology 16:75–77
KATO A, ROPERT-COUDERT Y Y CHIARADIA A (2008)Regulation of trip duration by an inshore forager,the little penguin (Eudyptula minor), during incu-bation. Auk 122:588–593
KATO A, WATANUKI Y, NISHIUMI I, KUROKI M, SHAUGH-NESSY P Y NAITO Y (2000) Variation in foraging andparental behaviour of king cormorants. Auk117:718–730
LACK D (1954) The natural regulation of animal num-bers. Oxford University Press, Oxford
LEWIS S, BENVENUTI S, DALL’ANTONIA L, GRIFFITHS R,MONEY L, SHERRATT T, WANLESS S Y HAMER K (2002)Sex-specific foraging behaviour in a monomor-phic seabird. Proceedings of the Royal Society B269:1687–1693
MIYAZAKI M Y WAAS JR (2003) Correlations betweenbody size, defensive behaviour and reproductivesuccess in male Little Blue Penguins Eudyptulaminor: implications for female choice. Ibis 145:98–105
OTLEY HM, CLAUSEN AP, CHRISTIE DJ Y PÜTZ K (2004)Aspects of the breeding biology of the MagellanicPenguin in the Falkland Islands. Waterbirds27:396–405
PETERS RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
PÜTZ K, INGHAM R Y SMITH J (2002) Foraging move-ments of Magellanic penguins Spheniscus magella-nicus during the breeding season in the FalklandIslands. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and FreshwaterEcosystems 12:75–87
PÜTZ K, RAYA REY A, HUIN N, SCHIAVINI A, PÜTZ A YLÜTHI BH (2006) Diving characteristics of southernrockhopper penguins (Eudyptes c. chrysocome) in thesouthwest Atlantic. Marine Biology 149:125–137
RADL A Y CULIK BM (1999) Foraging behaviour andreproductive success in Magellanic penguins(Spheniscus magellanicus): a comparative study oftwo colonies in southern Chile. Marine Biology133:381–393
RAYA REY A, PÜTZ K, LUNA-JORQUERA G, LÜTHI B YSCHIAVINI A (2009) Diving patterns of breedingfemale rockhopper penguins (Eudyptes chrysocome):Noir Island, Chile. Polar Biology 32:561
REID WV Y BOERSMA PD (1990) Parental quality andselection of egg size in the Magellanic Penguin.Evolution 44:1780–1786
SCHIAVINI A, YORIO P, GANDINI P, RAYA REY A Y BOERSMAPD (2005) Los pingüinos de las costas argentinas:estado poblacional y conservación. Hornero 20:5–23SCHREIBER EA (2002) Climate and weather effects onseabirds. Pp. 179–215 en: SCHREIBER EA Y BURGER J(eds) Biology of marine birds. CRC Press, Nueva York
SOKAL RR Y ROHLF FJ (1995) Biometry. The principlesand practice of statistics in biological research. WH Free-man, Nueva York
TAYLOR SS, LEONARD ML, BONESS DJ Y MAJLUF P (2002)Foraging by Humboldt penguins (Spheniscushumboltdti) during the chick-rearing period: generalpatterns, sex differences, and recommendations toreduce incidental catches in fishing nets. CanadianJournal of Zoology 80:700–707
VOLKMAN NJ, PRESLER P Y TRIVELPIECE W (1980) Dietsof pygoscelid penguins at King George Island,Antarctica. Condor 82:373–378
WALKER BG Y BOERSMA PD (2003) Diving behavior ofMagellanic Penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) atPunta Tombo, Argentina. Canadian Journal of Zool-ogy 81:1471–1483
WATANUKI Y, TAKAHASHI A, SATO K, KATO A Y BOST CA(2004) Inter-colony and sex differences in the effectsof parental body condition and foraging effort onthe brood growth of Adélie penguins. Journal ofEthology 22:91–98
WILLIAMS TD, BRIGGS DR, CROXALL JP, NAITO Y Y KATOA (1992) Diving pattern and performance in rela-tion to foraging ecology in the gentoo penguin,Pygoscelis papua. Journal of Zoology 227:211–230
WILSON RP, PÜTZ K, PETERS G, CULIK B, SCOLARO JA,CHARRASSIN JB Y ROPERT-COUDERT Y (1997) Long-term attachment of transmitting and recordingdevices to penguins and other seabirds. WildlifeSociety Bulletin 25:101–106
WILSON RP, SCOLARO JA, GRÉMILLET D, KIERSPEL MAM,LAURENTI S, UPTON J, GALLELLI H, QUINTANA F, FRERE E,MÜLLER G, STRATEN MT Y ZIMMER I (2005) How doMagellanic penguins cope with variability in theiraccess to prey? Ecological Monographs 75:379–401
WILSON RP, SCOLARO JA, PETERS G, LAURENTI S, KIERSPELM, GALLELLI H Y UPTON J (1995) Foraging areas ofMagellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) breed-ing at San Lorenzo, Argentina, during the incuba-tion period. Marine Ecology Progress Series 129:1–6
WILSON RP Y WILSON MP (1990) Foraging ecology ofbreeding Spheniscus penguins. Pp. 181–206 en: DAVISLS Y DARBY JT (eds) Penguin biology. Academic Press,San Diego
YORIO P Y BOERSMA PD (1994a) Causes of nest deser-tion during incubation in the Magellanic Penguin(Spheniscus magellanicus). Condor 96:1076–1081
YORIO P Y BOERSMA PD (1994b) Consequences of nestdesertion and inattendance for Magellanic Penguinhatching success. Auk 111:215–218
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.