Perception and use of birds in rural ecosystems of Salta, Jujuy and southern Bolivia
Tapa del número actual

Keywords

Chaco
ethno-ornithology
Monte
perception
Prepuna
Puna
Salta
Tucuman-Bolivian Moist Forest
use

Abstract

In order to know the perception and use of the avifauna by local communities in the ecosystems of the Salta Province, field surveys were carried out between 1997–2007 in the Semiarid Chaco, the Monte, the Prepuna, the Puna and the Tucumano-Bolivian Forest of Salta, Jujuy and southern Bolivia. In the Semiarid Chaco, through participant observation and open interviews with hunters from 37 localities, 13 species used for food were identified, some of which are also used for the trade of meat, pets or feathers. In the rest of the ecosystems the species used were identified through a school activity in which the students drew all the wild animals they knew, indicating the use of each one, and in the Monte and Prepuna workshops were also held with the parents of the students. In the Monte, the activity was carried out in 17 schools in the Calchaqui Valley, involving 364 children and 49 parents. The survey in the Prepuna was carried out in the El Toro Gorge, in 6 schools with 83 students. In the Puna, 326 children from 8 schools participated in Salta, 3 in Jujuy and 1 in Villazón, Bolivia, in addition to 44 key informants. Finally, the activity was carried out in the Acambuco Provincial Reserve as representative of the Tucuman-Bolivian Moist Forest, where 81 children from 2 localities and 5 hunters participated, acting as key informants, identifying 26 species. The local inhabitants have a perception of wildlife oriented to use, so management plans should consider that subsistence hunting and control are practiced, even in protected areas.

References

ALVARSSON J (1988) The Mataco of the Gran Chaco. Anethnographic account of change and continuity in Matacosocio-economic organization. Almqvist & Wiksell Inter-national, Estocolmo

ARANCIBIA RG (1973) Vida y mitos del mundo Mataco.Ediciones Depalma, Buenos Aires

ARENAS P (2003) Etnografía y alimentación entre los Toba-Nachilamole#ek y Wichí-Lhuku’tas del Chaco Central.Edición del autor, Buenos Aires

BARBARÁN FR (2000) Recursos alimenticios derivadosde la caza, pesca y recolección de los Wichi del ríoPilcomayo (Provincia de Salta, Argentina). Pp.507–527 en: CABRERA E, MERCOLLI C Y RESQUIN R(eds) Manejo de fauna silvestre en Amazonia yLatinoamérica. CITES Paraguay, Fundación MoisésBertoni y University of Florida, Asunción

BARBARÁN FR (2002) Factibilidad de caza de sub-sistencia, comercial y deportiva en el ChacoSemiárido de la Provincia de Salta, Argentina.Fermentum 13:89–119

BARBARÁN FR (2004a) Usos mágicos, medicinales yrituales de la fauna en la Puna del Noroeste Argen-tino y Sur de Bolivia. Contribuciones al Manejo de VidaSilvestre en Latinoamérica 1:1–26

BARBARÁN FR (2004b) Economía campesina y percep-ción de la fauna en la Puna: sus vinculaciones conel comercio legal e ilegal de fibra de vicuña (Vicugnavicugna) en el Noroeste Argentino y Sur de Bolivia.Pp. 647–659 en: Memorias del VI Congreso Internacio-nal sobre Manejo de Fauna Silvestre en Amazonia yLatinoamérica. 5–10 Setiembre 2004, Iquitos, Perú.Wildlife Conservation Society Perú, Miraflores

BARBARÁN FR (2011) Evaluación de sostenibilidad delcomercio de fauna. Experiencia en el Chaco SemiáridoArgentino. Editorial Académica Española, Saarbrücken

BARBARÁN FR Y SARAVIA TOLEDO CJ (1997a) Statisticsregarding commercial use of the Blue Fronted Ama-zon Parrot Amazona aestiva in Salta Province, Argen-tina (1977–1992). Vida Silvestre Neotropical 6:3–7

BARBARÁN FR Y SARAVIA TOLEDO CJ (1997b) Monitor-ing an exports moratorium of the Blue-FrontedAmazon Parrot Amazona aestiva in Salta Province,Argentina (1992–1996). Vida Silvestre Neotropical6:15–20

BIANCHETTI MC (1999) Cosmovisión sobrenatural de lalocura. Pautas populares de salud mental en la PunaArgentina. Víctor Manuel Hanne Editor, SaltaBUCHER EH (1988) Criterios básicos para el manejointegrado de aves plaga. Pp. 78–83 en:

RODRÍGUEZEN Y ZACCAGNINI ME (eds) Manual de capacitaciónsobre manejo integrado de aves perjudiciales a la agricul-tura. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para laAlimentación y la Agricultura, Buenos Aires

BUCHER EH, SARAVIA TOLEDO CJ, MIGLIETTA S YZACCAGNINI ME (1992) Status and management of theBlue-fronted Amazon in Argentina. Psitascene 2:3–6

CANALS FRAU S (1940) Distribución geográfica de losaborígenes del N.O. argentino en el siglo XVI. Ana-les del Instituto de Etnografía Americana de la Universi-dad Nacional de Cuyo 1:217–234

CANALS FRAU S (1951) Unidad y división en la anti-gua población del Noroeste. Anales del InstitutoÉtnico Nacional 4:67–88

DAYER AA, STINCHFIELD H Y MANFREDO MJ (2007) Sto-ries about wildlife: developing an instrument foridentifying wildlife value orientations cross-culturally. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 12:307–315

GARCÍA FERNÁNDEZ JJ, OJEDA RA, FRAGA RM, DÍAZ GBY BAIGÚN RJ (1997) Libro rojo de los mamíferos y avesamenazados de la Argentina. FUCEMA, SAREM, AOPy APN, Buenos Aires

PALMA NH (1978) La medicina natural en el NoroesteArgentino. Huemul, Buenos Aires

SADS (2010) Resolución 348/2010. Apruébese la clasifi-cación de aves autóctonas, conforme al ordenamiento esta-blecido en el Decreto N° 666/97. Secretaría de Ambientey Desarrollo Sustentable, Buenos Aires

TORRES GF, BIANCHETTI MC Y SANTONI ME (1985) Ladieta de los campesinos del Valle Calchaquí y de laPuna y sus determinantes culturales. KallawayaSerieMonográfica 1:1–46

WELLER SC Y ROMNEY AK (1988) Systematic data collec-tion. Sage, Newbury Park

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.