Aspects of the reproductive biology of the Great Kiskadee (<i>Pitangus sulphuratus</i>) under different degrees of urbanization in an urban agglomeration of Northwestern Argentina
Tapa del numero actual
PDF (Spanish)

Supplementary Files

PDF (Spanish)

Keywords

nesting
Pitangus sulphuratus
Tucumán
urban adapter
urbanization

Abstract

Urbanizations are one of the main causes of biodiversity loss. However, birds are no strangers to the new challenges of city life. The Great Kiskadee (Pitangus sulphuratus) is common in various environments, including rural and urban. In Greater San Miguel de Tucumán (GSMT), province of Tucumán, Argentina, there are higher levels of urbanization to the east and lower levels to the west, bordering the Sierra de San Javier. Although different aspects of the biology of birds in natural environments are known, knowledge in urban environments is scarce. The objective of this work was to evaluate different aspects of the nesting of the Great Kiskadee in urban environments and how they vary between different levels of urbanization. The study was carried out in three sectors of the GSMT, two in the city of San Miguel de Tucumán and one in Yerba Buena, during the reproductive seasons (September-March) of 2020-2022. A total of 46 nests were found, of which 27 of them were successful. The known breeding period for the species, the height of nest supports are extended, and the materials used in nest construction and the survival success of fledglings are described in greater detail. There were no differences in the relative abundance of Great Kiskadee, nor in the reproductive traits evaluated, between the different levels of urbanization. These results could indicate that the Great Kiskadee is an urban adapter in terms of its nesting and relative abundance.

PDF (Spanish)

References

Amâncio S, Barbosa de Souza V y Melo C (2008) Columba livia e Pitangus sulphuratus como indicadoras de qualidade ambiental em área urbana. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, 16:32-37

Battisti C, Staffieri E, Poeta G, Sorace A, Luiselli L y Amori G (2019) Interactions between anthropogenic litter and birds: a global review with a “black-list” of species. Marine Pollution Bulletin 138:93-114

Beninde J, Veith M y Hochkirch A (2015) Biodiversity in cities needs space: a metaanalysis of factors determining intra-urban biodiversity variation. Ecology Letters 18: 581-592

Bibby CJ, Hill DA y Burgess ND (2000) Bird Census Techniques. 2nd ed. Academic Press, London

Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications 6:506-519

Blettler MCM y Mitchell C (2021) Dangerous traps: macroplastic encounters affecting freshwater and terrestrial wildlife. Science of the Total Environment 798:149317

Brown A, Martinez Ortiz U, Acerbi M. y Corcuera J (2006) La Situación Ambiental Argentina 2005, Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina, Buenos Aires

Canevari M, Canevari P, Carrizo GR, Harris G, Rodriguez Mata J y Straneck RJ (1991) Nueva Guía de las Aves Argentinas. Vols 1 y 2. Fundación Acindar, Buenos Aires

Cepillo T y Fitzpatrick JW (2020) Great Kiskadee (Pitangus sulphuratus), versión 1.0. En Birds of the World (AF Poole y FB Gill, Editores). Laboratorio de Ornitología de Cornell, Ithaca, NY, EE. UU.

Corrales-Moya J y Sandoval L (2021) Does the distance to forests or buildings influence Great Kiskadee (Pitangus sulphuratus) nesting site selection? Ornitología Neotropical 32: 28–33

Croci S, Butet A, Georges A, Aguejdad R y Clergeau P (2008) Small urban woodlands as biodiversity conservation hot-spot: a multi-taxon approach. Landscape Ecology 23:1171-1186

Ghalambor CK y Martin TE (2002) Comparative manipulation of predation risk in incubating birds reveals variability in the plasticity of responses. Behavioral Ecology 13:101-108

Grau HR, Hernández ME, Gutierrez J, Gasparri NI, Casavecchia MC, Flores-Ivaldi EE y Paolini L (2008) A peri-urban neotropical forest transition and its consequences for environmental services. Ecology and Society 13: 35

Gorena RL (1995) Feeding and nesting ecology of the Great Kiskadee, Pitangus sulphuratus texanus (Passeriformes: Tyrannidae) in the lower Rio Grande valley, Texas. Master's Thesis, Univ. of Texas-Pan American, Edinburg

Gupta A (2002) Geoindicators for Tropical Urbanization. Environmental Geology 42: 736‐742

Gutiérrez Angonese J (2010) Dinámica espacio-temporal de crecimiento urbano en el pedemonte oriental de la sierra de San Javier (1986-2045). Pp 137-151 en Grau HR (ed) Ecología de una interfase natural – urbana. La sierra de San Javier y el Gran San Miguel de Tucumán. EDUNT, Tucumán

Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD, Lovejoy TE, Sexton JO, Austin MP, Collins CD, Cook WM, Damschen EI, Ewers RM, Foster BL, Jenkins CN, King AJ, Laurance WF, Levey DJ, Margules CR, Melbourne BA y Townshend JR (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth's ecosystems. Science advances 1: e1500052

Haedo J, Blendinger PG y Gasparri NI (2010) Estructura espacial del ensamble de aves en el gradiente de urbanización de Yerba Buena – San Miguel de Tucumán, noroeste de Argentina. Pp. 153-166 en Grau HR (ed.) Ecología de una interfase natural – urbana. La sierra de San Javier y el Gran San Miguel de Tucumán. EDUNT, Tucumán

Haedo J, Gioia A, Aráoz E, Paolini L y Malizia A (2017) Primary productivity in cities and their influence over subtropical bird assemblages. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 26:57-64

Han Y, Bai J, Zhang Z, Wu T, Chen P, Sun G, Miao L, Xu Z, Yu L, Zhu C, Zhao D, Ge G y Ruan L (2019) Nest site selection for five common birds and their coexistence in an urban habitat. Science of the Total Environment 690:748-759

IBODA (2014) Catálogo de las Plantas Vasculares del Cono Sur. Instituto de Botánica Darwinion. Disponible en http://www.darwin.edu.ar/Proyectos/FloraArgentina/fa.htm

Ikin KE, Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J y Manning AD (2012) Linking bird species traits to vegetation characteristics in a future urban development zone: implications for urban planning. Urban Ecosystems 15: 961-977

Indec (2010) Censo nacional de población, Hogares y viviendas 2010. Disponible es: http://www.indec.gob.ar

InfoStat (2008) InfoStat, versión 2008. Manual del Usuario. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Primera Edición, Editorial Brujas Argentina

Jagiello Z, Dylewski L, Tobolka M y Aguirre JI (2019) Life in a polluted world: a global review of anthropogenic materials in bird nests. Environmental Pollution 251:717-722

Jokimäki J, Suhonen J, Jokimäki-Kaisanlahti ML y Carbó-Ramírez P (2016) Effects of urbanization on breeding birds in European towns: impacts of species traits. Urban Ecosystems 19:1565-1577

Juri MD (2007) Estudios ecológicos de la Comunidad de Aves en un gradiente urbano. Tucumán, Argentina. Tesis doctoral, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán

Juri MD y Chani JM (2009) Variación estacional en la composición de las comunidades de aves en un gradiente urbano. Ecología Austral 19:175-258

Kark S, Iwaniuk A, Schalimtzek A y Banker E (2007) Living in the city: can anyone become an ‘urban exploiter’? Journal of Biogeography 34: 638-651

Leveau LM (2021) Temporal persistence of taxonomic and functional composition in bird communities of urban areas: an evaluation after a 6-year gap in data collection. Urban Ecosystems 25:9-20

Leveau LM, Jokimäki J y Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M (2021) Urbanization buffers seasonal change in composition of bird communities: A multi-continental meta-analysis. Journal of Biogeography 48:2391-2401

Leveau LM e Ibáñez I (2022) Nesting Site and Plumage Color Are the Main Traits Associated with Bird Species Presence in Urban Areas. Animals 12: 1148

Llambías PE y Ferretti V (2003) Parental care in the Great Kiskadee. Wilson Bulletin 115: 214-216

Luck GW, Lavorel S, McIntyre S y Lumb K (2012) Improving the application of vertebrate trait-based frameworks to the study of ecosystem services. Journal of Animal Ecology 81:1065-1076

Marzluf JM (2017) A decadal review of urban ornithology and a prospectus for the future.Ibis 15:1-13

Mckinney M (2002) Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation. BioScience 52: 883‐890

Nuñez Montellano MG, Guerra C y Jayat JP (2010) Vertebrados terrestres de la Sierra de San Javier (Tucumán, Argentina) y su área de influencia. En: H. R. Grau (ed.), Ecología de una interfase natural – urbana. La Sierra de San Javier y el gran San Miguel de Tucumán. EDUNT, pp. 51-76

O’Hanlon NJ, Bond AL, Lavers JL, Masden EA y James NA (2019) Monitoring nest incorporation of anthropogenic debris by northern gannets across their range. Environmental Pollution 255: 113152

Patankar S, Jambhekar R, Suryawanshi KR y Nagendra H (2021) Which traits influence bird survival in the city? A review. Land 10:92

Paton GD, Shoffner AV, Wilson AM y Gagne SA (2019) The traits that predict the magnitude and spatial scale of forest bird responses to urbanization intensity. PLoS ONE 14, e0220120

Pauchard A, Aguayo M, Peña E y Urrutia R (2006) Multiple effects of urbanization on biodiversity of developing countries: the case of a fast‐growing metropolitan area (Concepción, Chile). Biological Conservation 127: 272‐281

Peluc SI, Sillett TS, Rotenberry JT y Ghalambord CK (2008) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in an island songbird exposed to a novel predation risk. Behavioral Ecology 19: 830–835

de la Peña MR (2021) Nidos y Reproducción de Aves Argentinas. Tomo 2 Passeriformes. Comunicaciones del Museo Provincial de Ciencias Naturales Florentino Ameghino N° 2

Pereira Z y Melo C (2012) Nestling’s pellets of the Great Kiskadee (Pitangus sulphuratus) in brazilian urbane environment. Ornitologia Neotropical 23:269-276

Perepelizin PV y Faggi AM (2009) Diversidad De Aves En Tres Barrios De La Ciudad De Buenos Aires, Argentina. Multequina 18:71-85

Reynaud PA y Thioulouse J (2000) Identification of birds as biological markers along a neotropical urban-rural gradient (Cayenne, French Guiana), using co-inertia analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 59: 121-140

Reynolds SJ, Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Sumasgutner P y Mainwaring MC (2019) Urbanization and nest building in birds: a review of threats and opportunities. Journal of Ornithology 160: 841-860

Robertson EP y Olsen BJ (2015) Behavioral plasticity in nest building increases fecundity in marsh birds. The Auk 132: 37-45

Rodewald AD, Kearns LJ y Shustack DP (2013) Consequences of urbanizing landscapes to reproductive performance of birds in remnant forests. Biological Conservation 160:32-39

Rupert C (1997) Breeding densities and habitat of riparian birds along the lower Rio Grande, Texas. Master's Thesis, Univ. of Texas-Pan American, Edinburg

Salvador S (2012) Reutilización De Nidos Por Aves En El Área Central De Córdoba, Argentina. Nótulas Faunísticas - Segunda Serie 91:1-9

Savard J, Clergeau P y Mennechez G (2000) Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystem. Landscape and Urban Planning 48: 131‐142

Sazima I y D'Angelo G (2015) Dangerous traps: anhingas mistake anthropogenic debris for prey fish at an urban site in South-Eastern Brazil. Revista Brasileria de Ornitología 23: 380-384

Stagol LK, Manning AD, Knight E, Fischer J y Lindenmayer DB (2010) Using bird-habitat relationships to inform urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 98: 13-25

Suarez-Rubio M, Leimgruber P y Renner SC (2011) Influence of exurban development on bird species richness and diversity. Journal of Ornithology 152:461-471

Svensson E (1997) Natural selection on avian breeding time: causality, fecundity-dependent, and fecundity-independent selection. Evolution 51:1276-1283

Thornton M, Todd I y Roos S (2017) Breeding success and productivity of urban and rural Eurasian Sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus in Scotland. Écoscience 24: 115–126

Trópicos (2015) Missouri Botanical Garden. Disponible en http://www.tropicos.org

United Nations (2015) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, (ST/ESA/SER.A/366). Ed. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. The United Nations, New York

Wilson MC, Chen X, Corlett RT, Didham RK, Ding P, Holt RD, Holyoak M, Hu G, Hughes AC, Jiang L, Laurance WF, Liu J, Pimm SL, Robinson SK, Russo SE, Si X, Wilcove DS, Wu J y Yu M (2016) Habitat fragmentation and biodiversity conservation: key findings and future challenges. Landscape Ecology 31: 219-227

Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical Analysis. 3rd Edition, Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.