Estado poblacional, ecología y conservación del Petrel Gigante del Sur (<i>Macronectes giganteus</i>) en Argentina
Tapa del número actual
PDF

Palabras clave

Argentina
aves marinas
conservación
Macronectes giganteus
Petrel Gigante del Sur
plataforma continental argentina

Cómo citar

Quintana, Flavio, Adrián Schiavini, and Sofía Copello. 2005. “Estado Poblacional, ecología Y conservación Del Petrel Gigante Del Sur (Macronectes Giganteus) En Argentina”. El Hornero 20 (1): 25-34. https://doi.org/10.56178/eh.v20i1.817.

Resumen

El Petrel Gigante del Sur (Macronectes giganteus) es un ave marina pelágica con distribución circumpolar en el Hemisferio Sur y está considerado como especie Vulnerable. Es el único procellariiforme que nidifica en la costa argentina (a excepción de las Islas Malvinas). En Argentina, sus sitios de nidificación están restringidos a dos colonias en la provincia de Chubut (Isla Arce e Isla Gran Robredo) y dos colonias en Isla de los Estados (Isla Observatorio y Península López). La población reproductiva se estima en 2600 parejas, el 90% de las cuales pertenece a las colonias de Chubut. La puesta de un único huevo se inicia durante la última semana de octubre y la eclosión durante la última semana de diciembre. La independencia de los pichones ocurre hacia la segunda semana de marzo y principios de abril. La dieta está compuesta principalmente por pingüinos y cefalópodos (principalmente calamar) y por restos de mamíferos marinos, peces y decápodos. La basura constituye un componente importante de su dieta. Las áreas de alimentación durante el período reproductivo se localizan al borde del talud, en la plataforma media y en áreas costeras, con una marcada segregación sexual en el uso del espacio. Dichas áreas tienen una marcada superposición espacio-temporal con las pesquerías de langostino, calamar y merluza. El monitoreo de las poblaciones, el registro de parámetros reproductivos básicos, el conocimiento del comportamiento en el mar y la determinación de las áreas de alimentación del Petrel Gigante del Sur constituyen información prioritaria para desarrollar pautas de manejo y conservación de sus poblaciones.

PDF

Referencias

ACHA EM, MIANZAN H, GUERRERO R, FAVERO M Y BAVAJ(2004) Marine fronts at the continental shelves ofaustral South America: physical and ecological pro-cesses. Journal of Marine Systems 44:83–105

AUMAN HJ, LUDWIG JP, GIESY JP Y COLBORN T (1998)Plastic ingestion by Laysan Albatross chicks on SandIsland, Midway Atoll, in 1994 and 1995. Pp. 239–244en: ROBERTSON G Y GALES R (eds) Albatross biologyand conservation. Surrey Beatty and Sons, ChippingNorton

AUMAN HJ, LUDWIG JP, SUMMER CL, VERBRUGGE DA,FROESE KL, COLBORN T Y GIESY JP (1997) PCBs, DDE,DDT, and TCDD-EQ in two species of albatross onSand Island, Midway Atoll, North Pacific Ocean.Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 16:498–504

BEZZI S, AKSELMAN R Y BOSCHI E (2000) Síntesis del es-tado de las pesquerías marítimas argentinas y de la Cuencadel Plata. Años 1997-1998, con actualización del 1999.SAGPyA, INIDEP, Mar del Plata

BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2004) Threatened birds of theworld 2004. BirdLife International, Cambridge

BROTHERS NP, COOPER J Y LØKKEBORG S (1999) The inci-dental catch of seabirds by longline fisheries: worldwidereview and technical guidelines for mitigation. Food andAgriculture Organization of the United Nations, Roma

BRUNETTI NE, ELENA B, ROSSI GR, IVANOVIC ML,AUBONE A, GUERRERO R Y BENAVIDES H (1998) Sum-mer distribution, abundance and population struc-ture of Illex argentinus on the Argentine shelf in re-lation to environmental features. South African Jour-nal of Marine Science 20:175–186

CARO TM Y O’DOHERTY G (1999) On the use of surro-gate species in conservation biology. ConservationBiology 13:805–814

COOPER J, BROOKE MDL, BURGER AE, CRAWFORD RJM,HUNTER S Y WILLIAMS T (2001) Aspects of the breed-ing biology of the Northern Giant Petrel (Macronecteshalli) and the Southern Giant Petrel (M. giganteus)at sub-antarctic Marion Island. International Journalof Ornithology 4:53–68

COPELLO S Y QUINTANA F (2003) Marine debris inges-tion by Southern Giant Petrels and its potential re-lationships with fisheries in the Southern AtlanticOcean. Marine Pollution Bulletin 46:1513–1515

COPPOLILLO PB, GOMEZ H, MAISELS F Y WALLACE R(2003) Selection criteria for suites of landscape spe-cies as a basis for site-based conservation. BiologicalConservation 115:419–430

CROXALL JP (1998) Research and conservation: a fu-ture for albatrosses? Pp. 267–288 en: ROBERTSON G YGALES R (eds) Albatross biology and conservation.Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton

CROXALL JP Y WACE N (1995) Interactions betweenmarine and terrestrial ecosystems. Pp. 115–120 en:DINGWALL PR (ed) Progress in conservation of the sub-antarctic islands. World Conservation Union, Gland

CROXALL JP Y WOOD AG (2002) The importance of thePatagonian shelf for top predator species breedingat South Georgia. Aquatic Conservation: Marine andFreshwater Ecosystems 12:101–118

DEVILLERS P Y TERSCHUREN JA (1980) Les petrel geants(Macronectes) des Iles Falklands et du Sud del’Amerique du Sud. Gerfaut 70:447–454

FAVERO M, KHATCHIKIAN CE, ARIAS A, SILVA RODRÍGUEZMP, CAÑETE G Y MARIANO-JELICICH R (2003) Estimatesof seabird by-catch along the Patagonian Shelf byArgentine longline fishing vessels, 1999–2001. BirdConservation International 13:273–281

FAVERO M Y SILVA RODRÍGUEZ MP (2005) Estado actualy conservación de aves pelágicas que utilizan la pla-taforma continental argentina como área de alimen-tación. Hornero 20:95–110

FURNESS RW (2003) Impacts of fisheries on seabirdcommunities. Scientia Marina 67:33–45

GARTHE S, WALTER U, TASKER ML, BECKER PH,CHAPDELAINE G Y FURNESS RW (1999) Evaluation ofthe role of discards in supporting bird populationsand their effects on the species composition of sea-birds in the North Sea. Pp. 29–41 en: Diets of seabirdsand consequences of change in food supply. Coopera-tive Research Report 232, ICES, Copenhague

GONZÁLEZ AF, TRATHAN PN, YAU C Y RODHOUSE PG(1997) Interactions between oceanography, ecologyand fishery biology of the ommastrephid squidMartialia hyadesi in the South Atlantic. Marine Ecol-ogy Progress Series 152:205–215

GONZÁLEZ-SOLÍS J, CROXALL JP Y WOOD AG (2000a)Foraging partitioning between giant petrelsMacronectes spp. and its relationship with breedingpopulation changes at Bird Island, South Georgia.Marine Ecology Progress Series 204:279–288

GONZÁLEZ-SOLÍS J, CROXALL JP Y WOOD AG (2000b)Sexual dimorphism and sexual segregation in forag-ing strategies of northern giant petrels, Macronecteshalli, during incubation. Oikos 90:390–398

GONZÁLEZ-SOLÍS J, SANPERA C Y RUIZ X (2002) Metalsand selenium as bioindicators of geographic andthropic segregation in giant petrels Macronectes spp.Marine Ecology Progress Series 244:257–264

GONZÁLEZ ZEBALLOS D Y YORIO P (en prensa) Seabirduse of waste and incidental capture at the Argen-tine hake trawl fishery in Golfo San Jorge Argen-tina. Marine Ecology Progress Series

HARRISON P (1983) Seabirds: an identification guide.Croom-Helm, Beckenham

HUMPHREY PS Y LIVESEY BC (1983) Giant petrels(Macronectes giganteus) nesting in Chubut, Argen-tina. Gerfaut 73:3–8

HUNTER S (1983) The food and feeding ecology of thegiant petrels Macronectes halli and M. giganteus atSouth Georgia. Journal of Zoology 200:521–538

HUNTER S (1984) Breeding biology and populationdynamics of giant petrel Macronectes at SouthGeorgia (Aves: Procellariiformes). Journal of Zoology203:441–460

HUNTER S (1985) The role of giant petrels in the South-ern Ocean ecosystem. Pp. 534–542 en: SIEGFRIED WR,CONDY PR Y LAWS RM(eds)Antarctic nutrient cyclesand food webs. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

HUNTER S (1987) Species and sexual isolating mecha-nisms in sibling species of giant petrel Macronectes.Polar Biology 7:295–301

HUNTER S Y BROOKE MDL (1992) The diet of giantpetrels Macronectes spp. at Marion Island, SouthernIndian Ocean. Colonial Waterbirds 15:56–65

IMSHAUG HA (1972) R/V Hero cruise 71-5 to Isla de losEstados (Staten Island). Antarctic Journal of the UnitedStates 7:42–44

IUCN (2004) 2004 IUCN Red list of threatened species.World Conservation Union, Cambridge (URL:http://www.iucnredlist.org/)

JOHNSTONE GW (1974) Field characters and behaviourat sea of Giant Petrels in relation to their oceanicdistribution. Emu 74:209–218

JOUVENTIN P Y WEIMERSKIRCH H (1991) Changes in thepopulation size and demography of southern sea-birds: management implications. Pp. 297–314 en:PERRIS CM, LEBRETON JD Y HIRONS GJM (eds) Birdpopulation studies: their relevance to conservation andmanagement. Oxford University Press, Oxford

LAMBECK RJ (1997) Focal species: a multi-species um-brella for nature conservation. Conservation Biology11:849–856

MORENO CA, RUBILAR PS, MARSCHOFF E Y BENZAQUENL(1996) Factors affecting the incidental mortality ofseabirds in the Dissostichus eleginoides fishery in theSouthwest Atlantic (subarea 48.3, 1995 season).CCAMLR Science 3:70–91

NEL DC, RYAN PG, CRAWFORD RJM, COOPER J Y HUYSEROAW (2002) Population trends of albatrosses andpetrels at sub-Antarctic Marion Island. Polar Biology25:81–89

NOSS RF (2000) Landscape species as conservation tools.Wildlife Conservation Society, Nueva York

ORO D (1999) Trawler discards: a threat or a resourcefor opportunistic seabirds? Pp. 717–730 en: ADAMSNJ Y SLOTOW RH (eds) 22nd International Ornithol-ogy Congress. BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburgo

PATTERSON DL Y FRASER W (2000) Foraging move-ments of Southern Giant Petrels Macronectesgiganteus on the Antarctic Peninsula: preliminaryfindings of a satellite-tracking study during thebreeding season. Marine Ornithology 28:142

PATTERSON DL Y HUNTER S (1998) International GiantPetrel Banding Project. Interim Report. Bird BiologySubcommittee, Scientific Commitee on AntarcticResearch, Cambridge

PATTERSON DL, WOEHLER EJ, CROXALL JP, COOPER J,PONCET S Y FRASER WR (en prensa) Breeding distri-bution and population status of the northern giantpetrel Macronectes halli and the southern giant pe-trel M. giganteus. Marine Ornithology

PUNTA G Y SARAVIA J (1991) A newly discovered colonyof sourthern giant petrels Macronectes giganteus onisla Gran Robredo, Chubut Province, Argentina.Marine Ornithology 19:131–133

QUINTANA F Y DELL’ARCIPRETE P (2002) Foraginggrounds of southern giant petrels (Macronectesgiganteus) on the Patagonian shelf. Polar Biology25:159–161

REDFORD KH, COPPOLILLO P, SANDERSON E, DA FONSECAGAB, DINERSTEIN E, GROVES C, MACE G, MAGINNIS S,MITTERMEIER RA, NOSS R, OLSON D, ROBINSON J,VEDDER A Y WRIGHT M (2003) Mapping the conser-vation landscape. Conservation Biology 17:116–131

RIDOUX V (1994) The diets and dietary segregation ofseabirds at the subantarctic Crozet Islands. MarineOrnithology 22:1–192

SANDERSON EW, REDFORD KH, VEDDER A, COPPOLILLOPB Y WARD SE (2002) A conceptual model for con-servation planning based on landscape species re-quirements. Landscape and Urban Planning 58:41–56

SCHIAVINI ACM, FRERE E, YORIO P Y PARERA A (1999)Las aves marinas de la Isla de los Estados, Tierra delFuego, Argentina: revisión histórica, estado pobla-cional y problemas de conservación. Anales del Ins-tituto de la Patagonia, Ciencias Naturales 27:25–40

SCHIAVINI A, LIZURUME ME, FRERE E, BERTELLOTTI M,GARCÍA N Y CHIZZINI A (1994) Relevamiento aéreo otoñalde la fauna superior costera de Tierra del Fuego.Fundación Patagonia Natural, Puerto Madryn

SCHIAVINI A, YORIO P Y FRERE E (1998) Distribuciónreproductiva y abundancia de las aves marinas dela Isla Grande de Tierra del Fuego, Isla de los Estadose Islas de Año Nuevo (Provincia de Tierra del Fuego,Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur). Pp. 179–213 en:YORIO P, FRERE E, GANDINI P Y HARRIS G (eds) Atlasde la distribución reproductiva de aves marinas en el li-toral patagónico argentino. Fundación Patagonia Natu-ral y Wildlife Conservation Society, Buenos Aires

SIEVERT PR Y SILEO L (1993) The effects of ingest plasticon growth and survival of albatross chicks. Pp.212–217 en: VERNEER K, BRIGGS KT, MORGAN KH YSIEGEL CAUSEY D (eds) The status, ecology and conser-vation of marine birds of the North Pacific. CanadianWildlife Service, Ottawa

TASKER ML, CAMPHUYSEN C, COOPER J, GARTHE S,MONTEVECCHI WA Y BLABER SJM (2000) The impactsof fishing on marine birds. ICES Journal of MarineScience 57:531–547

THOMPSON KR (1992) Quantitative analysis of the useof discards from squid trawlers by Black-browedAlbatrosses Diomedea melanophris in the vicinity ofthe Falkland Islands. Ibis 134:11–21

UHART M, QUINTANA F, KARESH W Y BRASELTON WE(2003) Baseline hematology, biochemistries anddisease serology of the Southern Giant Petrel inPatagonia, Argentina. Journal of Wildlife Diseases39:359–365

VOISIN JF (1982) Observations on the Falkland Islandsgiant petrels Macronectes giganteus solanderi. Gerfaut72:367–380

VOISIN JF (1988) Breeding biology of the NorthernGiant Petrel Macronectes halli and the Southern GiantPetrel M. giganteus at Ile de la Possession, Iles Crozet1966–1980. Cormorant 16:65–97

VOISIN JF Y BESTER MN (1981) The specific status ofGiant petrels Macronectes at Gough Island. Pp.215–222 en: COOPER J (ed) Proceedings of the Sympo-sium on Birds of the Sea and Shore. African SeabirdGroup, Ciudad del Cabo

WALUDA CM, RODHOUSE PG, TRATHAN PN Y PIERCE GJ(2001) Remotely sensed mesoscale oceanographyand the distribution of Illex argentinus in the SouthAtlantic. Fisheries Oceanography 10:207–216

WARHAM J (1990) The petrels, their ecology and breedingsystems. Academic Press, Londres

WARHAM J (1996) The behaviour, population biology andphysiology of the petrels. Harcourt Brace, San Diego

WOEHLER EJ (1991) Status and conservation of theseabirds of Heard Island and the McDonald Island.Pp. 263–275 en: CROXALL JP (ed) Seabird status andconservation: a supplement. International Council forBird Preservation, Cambridge

WOODS RW Y WOODS A (1997) Atlas of breeding birds ofthe Falkland Islands. Redwood Books, Trowbridge

YORIO P Y CAILLE G (1999) Seabird interactions withcoastal fisheries in northern Patagonia: use of dis-cards and incidental captures in nets. Waterbirds22:207–216

YORIO P, GARCÍA BORBOROGLU P, BERTELLOTTI M,LIZURUME ME, GIACCARDI M, PUNTA G, SARAVIA J,HERRERA G, SOLLAZZO S Y BOERSMA PD (1998) Distri-bución reproductiva y abundancia de las aves ma-rinas de Chubut. Parte II: norte del Golfo San Jorge,de Cabo Dos Bahías a Comodoro Rivadavia. Pp.75–117 en: YORIO P, FRERE E, GANDINI P Y HARRIS G(eds) Atlas de la distribución reproductiva de aves mari-nas en el litoral patagónico argentino. Fundación Pata-gonia Natural y Wildlife Conservation Society,Buenos Aires

YORIO P Y HARRIS G (1997) Distribución reproductivade aves marinas y costeras coloniales en Patagonia:relevamiento aéreo Bahía Blanca–Cabo Vírgenes,noviembre 1990. Informes Técnicos del Plan de Mane-jo Integrado de la Zona Costera Patagónica – FundaciónPatagonia Natural 29:1–31

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas aún no están disponibles.